-
I. Status of the monitored item
Monitoring criteria Status Brief description and comments Source of information 1 Implementation 1.1 A decision has been reached to start the implementation of the monitored item 1.2 A procurement process is being/has been carried out related to the monitored item 1.3 Informative meetings and gatherings with stakeholders have been held 1.4 An implementation plan has been prepared for implementation of the monitored item 1.5 Necessary prerequisites to start with the implementation have been provided (e.g. permits, preparatory activities, staff, etc.) 1.6 The municipality is implementing specific activities from the implementation plan 1.7 Initial results from implementation of the monitored item are visible 2 Stagnation 2.1 Lack of funds in the municipal budget 2.2 Lack of one/some of the basic prerequisites 2.3 The implementation of the monitored item is no longer a priority 2.4 Halted due to an inspection, investigation, etc. 2.5 The reasons for the stagnation of the implementation of the activity are unknown -
II. Transparency and accountability of the municipality related to the monitored item
Monitoring criteria Status Brief description and comments Source of information 1 Information about the status of the monitored item is available on the municipality's website and social network 2 Information about the status of the project is obtained through a Request for Access to Public InformationInformation about the status of the monitored item is obtained through a Request for Access to Public Information 3 Information about the status of the monitored item is shared with stakeholders by municipal officials (via e.g. interviews, focus group discussions, meeting requests etc.) 4 There is practice of informal information sharing by the municipality with affected citizens (e.g. via informal discussions etc.) -
III. Citizen participation in decision-making related to the monitored item
Monitoring criteria Status Brief description and comments Source of information 1 The municipality has involved the citizens in decision-making related to the monitored item 2 Citizens have filed an initiative for participation in decision-making related to the monitored item 3 Citizens participate in the implementation of the monitored item with their input and resources 4 Mechanisms utilized by the municipality to ensure citizen participation, specifically as related to the monitored item: 4.1 Public gatherings, debates and forums 4.2 Possibility for e-participation via mobile apps, website(s), electronic templates, etc. 4.3 Open days of the municipality 4.4 Citizen initiatives
Legalizing buildings without construction permits – closing a historical process or perpetuating a never-ending story?
This initiative will monitor the legalization procedures implementation in the municipality, while mobilizing citizens to contribute to the prevention of illegal construction. Specific community mobilization activities will include: mapping the illegally constructed buildings in several pilot neighborhoods in the municipality of Kisela Voda; collecting data on the number of submitted legalization applications, number of cases resolved and the processing dynamics, as well as the number of decisions of construction inspectors to remove illegally constructed buildings; awareness-raising activities for citizens and similar.
The subject matter of the local monitoring refers to activities taken by the municipality of Kisela Voda to deal with illegal buildings.
Implementer
Animal and Environment Protection Association EQUALITY, DIGNITY, EMPATHY, NATURALISM Skopje
Location
Kisela Voda, Skopje
Budget
300000 denars
Status
Active